CPUs

Intel 14nm Processor Shortages Explained: How Ryzen Made it Worse

One of Intel’s most pressing concerns in 2019 and even this year was the 14nm processor shortages. Considering that nearly all of the company’s lineups are based on the 14nm process, this significantly hindered Intel’s supply chain. Both consumers and OEMs started to turn towards AMD whose attractive pricing was an added bonus. All this resulted in Team Red taking the lead in many European markets and capturing a fat chunk of the American markets from Intel.

How did it come to this? Well, as far as the 14nm shortage is concerned, there are many reasons. Unforeseen chip demand, unexpected product launches, ramping up of 10nm parts and so on. However, there is one reason for Intel’s supply shortages that no one talks about. The AMD Ryzen effect. Let’s have a look.

It all Started with Zen

In 2017, when AMD’s 1st Gen Ryzen first debuted, Intel was facing a highly competitive lineup from AMD the first time in over a decade. This was in the midst of when the company was trying to migrate to the 10nm node (back then Canon Lake). Intel was literally caught with their pants down.

After the 1st wave of the 10nm Cannon Lake parts turned out to be a disaster, Intel double-backed to the 14nm node, producing three back to back generations based on the Skylake core

After the 1st wave of the 10nm Cannon Lake parts turned out to be a disaster, Intel double-backed to the 14nm node, producing three back to back generations based on the Skylake core (and a fifth one in the form of Comet Lake). These were Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake, and the Coffee Lake refresh. They shared the same microarchitecture and process node as Skylake, and the only difference was that the core counts increased with each successive generation. This was done to keep up with AMD’s Ryzen CPUs: The Ryzen 7 1700X offered 8 cores and 16 threads while the competing Intel part, the Core i7-7700K was a quad-core chip with eight threads.

7th, 8th and 9th Gen Intel CPUs

The 8th Gen Coffee Lake lineup increased the core count of the Core i7-8700K to six while the 9th Gen Core i7-9700K had 8 cores and 16 threads. The upcoming 10th Gen Comet Lake-S lineup will include as many as 10 cores for the Core i9-10900K. As the process node and architecture were the same, this meant that the die size of Intel’s CPUs increased by almost 40% from the 7th to the 9th Generation.

The die sizes of Intel CPUs over the last few generations (Sq. mm):

  • Kaby Lake: 126
  • Coffee Lake: 152
  • Coffee Lake Refresh: 178

As the die size grew, the number of chips produced from a single yield decreased. Basically, as the wafer size or density didn’t increase, the number of CPUs obtained from each wafer decreased significantly. At the same time, market demand increased. This meant that within just a couple of years, Intel had to increase its 14nm production by more than 50% to avoid shortages. Only, that didn’t happen.

As the die size grew, the number of chips produced from a single yield decreased. In effect, the number of CPUs obtained from each wafer decreased significantly. To avoid shortages, Intel had to increase its 14nm production by more than 50%. Only, that didn’t happen.

The company took multiple steps to expand 14nm wafer production, but it just wasn’t enough, and the results are quite apparent today. After more than a year of shortages, Intel is forced to deal with a highly resurgent AMD and disgruntled OEMs shifting to AMD’s Ryzen CPUs to meet demand, simultaneously.

10nm Based Ice Lake & Tiger Lake, and 14nm Foundries

Of course, Intel has been investing billions in new foundries worldwide to improve 14nm production, but that’s a gradual and painstakingly slow process. By the time Kaby Lake production was over, the 14nm yields must have been quite high but when you suddenly increase production by one-half, there are bound to be problems. The new production lines are starting from scratch and don’t produce the same yields as the original foundries.

This means that nearly half of the foundry yields are sub-par or at least worse than the existing 14nm capacity. One of the reasons we’re seeing so many F CPUs (Core i3-9100F, 9400F) is because Intel can’t afford to discard chips with faulty iGPUs as the production is already falling short as it is.

When the 14nm yields are back to normal, Intel will have to disable chips with working iGPUs to serve the F-series market. Their lower price points will result in losses or reduced profits. That’s why the F parts were originally priced the same as the non-F variants.

The reason why these F parts weren’t cheaper than the non-F variants at launch is cos that would increase the demand for them. And Intel needs to keep it as low as possible. The 14nm yields will be back to normal soon enough and when that happens, the company will have to disable chips with working iGPUs to serve the F market, essentially selling them for a loss.

Then there are the new 10nm Ice Lake server and 10nm++ Tiger Lake mobile parts awaiting a mid or late 2020 launch. Although Intel finally managed to turn the 10nm node (10nm+ in this case) into usable Ice Lake chips, they are still absent from the volume markets.

Intel has promised 28 core Ice Lake SPs by the end of the year as well as the Xe GPUs by the end of the year. Since this is going to be another monolithic design, it’ll put a significant strain on Intel’s foundries.

Conclusion

Although Intel’s 10nm node failure can be attributed to an overly aggressive policy or perhaps the death of Moore’s Law, the 14nm shortages are a different case altogether. Intel didn’t anticipate that AMD’s Ryzen CPUs would be as disruptive as they turned out to be. And they certainly didn’t expect that their 14nm offerings would fail to match up to the 3rd Gen Ryzen parts even after doubling the die size. In the end, this reminds me of the tale of “The Hare and the Tortoise“.

Tags

Areej

Computer Engineering dropout (3 years), writer, journalist, and amateur poet. I started Techquila while in college to address my hardware passion. Although largely successful, it suffered from many internal weaknesses. Left and now working on Hardware Times, a site purely dedicated to. Processor architectures and in-depth benchmarks. That's what we do here at Hardware Times!
Back to top button
Close