GamingGPUs

Enable Ray-Tracing (RTX) in Almost Every Game w/ AMD Radeon GPUs Using this Mod

NVIDIA might have popularized ray-tracing (at least the term) among the masses, but even now only a small percentage of gamers have access to the technology. The reason is rather straight-forward: RTX GPUs are quite expensive and not everyone can afford them. More than half of the gamers worldwide still use a GTX 1060-level graphics cards, with a target resolution of 1080p:

On Steam, less than 3% of gamers own the RTX 2060, the cheapest RTX graphics card. That in itself tells you all you need to know. Luckily, even folks who don’t have NVIDIA’s latest RTX GPUs can test out ray-tracing and see what the fuss is all about. There are multiple ways you can try out real-time ray-tracing on your PC:

Crytek’s Noir Benchmark: Crytek’s Noir benchmark featuring RT ray-tracing is now publicly available. Although a rather mild implementation with certain compromises here and there, it looks gorgeous and requires modest hardest. An AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 can easily run the benchmark at 1080p with a stable 30 FPS throughout.

McFly’s Path Traced Global Illumination (PTGI): This is the one you’ll probably want to download. Before we go on, please keep in mind that this ray-tracing shader is still in beta, which requires a $5 subscription to access. The final version is going to be publicly accessible for free, but at the moment, you’ll have to shell out a tiny donation to try it out 🙂

Before we begin, you’ll probably want to know whether this is actual ray-tracing or some dirty hack. To answer that question, yes, this indeed is real-time ray-tracing. However, unlike NVIDIA’s RTX implementation, the PTGI shader doesn’t consider objects and sources not visible on the screen. It depends on the data available in the depth buffer. Then, what’s the point you may ask? Well, it still produces a much more accurate shadowing for objects present in the scene, much better than traditional SSAO and HBAO. It’s called Screen Space Ray-Tracing.

Difference Between ReShade PRGI Shader and NVIDIA RTX

The difference between McFly’s ReShade shader and NVIDIA varies from game to game, and in some the end-result is more or less than the same. In most games, RTX is implemented using standard ray-tracing where each ray of light undergoes a single intersection after which it returns to the light source. McFly’s solution uses path-tracing, meaning each ray after being cast undergoes several intersections with the objects in the scene before returning to the source.

While this is more accurate, it significantly more intensive too. NVIDIA’s RTX implementation in Quake and Minecraft also leverages path-tracing which is why they are so performance-intensive, despite having a low polygon count. However, at the same time keep in mind that while NVIDIA’s RTX implementation considers objects not present in the depth buffer as well (objects not visible) while McFly’s shader doesn’t.

How to Install ReShade Ray-Tracing Shader:

  • Firstly, download the ReShade setup from here.
  • Next, select the game executable which you want to test PTGI (ray-tracing) with and select the API (usually DirectX 11).
  • You can find which API a game uses by enabling MSI Afterburner OSD. It’ll mention whether the game uses DX9, 11 or 12 next to the FPS counter.
  • Then the ReShade setup will ask you to select the relevant shaders you want to inject into the selected game. You may choose your favorite shaders or select none. It won’t affect the path-tracing shader.
  • Now, download the ray-tracing shader from the McFly’s Patreon channel (again you’ll have to make a small $5 donation).
  • Extract the zipped folder and copy the “Shader” and “Textures” to the game directory where you installed ReShade and replace the existing ones.
  • Keep in mind that these two directories will be there in the “ReShade-shaders” folder which in-turn exists in the same folder as the exe.

Areej

Computer Engineering dropout (3 years), writer, journalist, and amateur poet. I started Techquila while in college to address my hardware passion. Although largely successful, it suffered from many internal weaknesses. Left and now working on Hardware Times, a site purely dedicated to.Processor architectures and in-depth benchmarks. That's what we do here at Hardware Times!
Back to top button