AMD Wraith Prism vs 360mm AIO Liquid Cooler: Ryzen 9 3900X Ft. NZXT Kraken X73

AMD’s wraith prism cooler is easily the best-looking stock CPU cooler out there. But RGB and aesthetics aside, is it any good is it in terms of actual function? The Ryzen 3000 processors are governed by the Precision Boost 2 algorithm which is fairly temperature-sensitive, among other things. Without a liquid cooler, it’s nearly impossible to get to the spec boost frequency, let alone overclock the CPUs.

That goes doubly true for the higher-end Ryzen 9 parts. In this post, we have a look at how much of an impact does a 360mm liquid cooler (closed-loop AIO) has on a twelve-core Ryzen processor. We’ll test the Ryzen 9 3900X across a range of applications. We’ll run the benchmarks at stock, with Precision Boost Overdrive enabled as well as with PBO and AutoOC turned on. In the end, we’ll decide whether you need a liquid cooler for your Ryzen 3000 CPU or the stock Wraith Prism cooler is enough.

AMD Ryzen Precision Boost 2 vs Precision Boost Overdrive vs AutoOC: What’s the Difference?

Test Bench

  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X/3900X
  • AIO Cooler: NZXT Kraken X73
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
  • Motherboard: ASRock X570 Taichi
  • Memory: Trident Z Royal 8GB x 2 @ 3600 MHz
  • PSU: Corsair HX1000i

AMD Wraith Prism Stock Cooler vs 360mm NZXT Kraken X73: Cinebench Performance

AIO Cooler: Kraken X73

That’s a healthy 5% performance boost simply on switching to an AIO cooler. The single-threaded performance is largely the same, but the multi-threaded score sees a neat uplift. It’s important to note that the base liquid cooler score is higher than even the overclocked wraith prism score.

Strangely, the PBO scores are lower than stock despite acceptable temperatures. The NZXT Kraken X73 used in the test is an excellent closed-loop cooler and manages to keep the 12 core Ryzen 9 3900X under 80 degrees even in the most intensive tasks.

Stock Cooler

AMD Stock vs 360mm Liquid Cooler Clock Scaling: Ryzen 9 3900X Single-Core

Even at stock, the frequency scaling is better when using the Kraken X73 AIO cooler. The single-core boost clock hits 4550MHz with the closed-loop liquid cooler but fails to reach even 4500MHz with the stock wraith prism cooler.

The PBO graphs are a bit strange. Under the stock cooler, the single-core boost takes a hit and drops to 4400MHz. Even when the Kraken X73 is installed, the boost clock is still a tad bit slower than the stock profile. My conclusion is that with PBO the power draw increases, but the factors restricting the favored-core boost aren’t lifted. Instead, the all-core boost is prioritized.

AutoOC mode sees a clear uplift when using the Kraken X73 AIO cooler. The single-core boost clock even manages to cross the 4.6GHz barrier (that’s the marketed boost clock for the 3900X!). In contrast, when the CPU was tested with the stock cooler, the boost clock barely reached 4.4GHz.

AMD Stock vs 360mm Liquid Cooler Clock Scaling: Cinebench R20 Multi-Core

Continued on page 2

1 2Next page


Computer Engineering dropout (3 years), writer, journalist, and amateur poet. I started Techquila while in college to address my hardware passion. Although largely successful, it suffered from many internal weaknesses. Left and now working on Hardware Times, a site purely dedicated to. Processor architectures and in-depth benchmarks. That's what we do here at Hardware Times!
Back to top button